Skip to content
.ca
4 minhigh

Inside Pay2Key: Technical Analysis of a Linux Ransomware Variant

Morphisec Threat Labs analyzed a Linux variant of the Iranian-attributed Pay2Key ransomware. The malware requires root privileges to execute, utilizes a JSON configuration file, disables system defenses like SELinux and AppArmor, and employs ChaCha20 for full or partial file encryption while lacking built-in network C2 or exfiltration capabilities.

Conf:highAnalyzed:2026-03-24reports

Authors: Ilia Kulmin

ActorsPay2KeyIranian-attributed ransomware group

Source:Morphisec

Key Takeaways

  • Pay2Key has developed a Linux ransomware variant that requires root privileges and is driven by a JSON configuration file.
  • Pre-encryption actions include disabling SELinux and AppArmor, stopping services, killing processes, and establishing persistence via a reboot-time cron entry.
  • The malware enumerates /proc/mounts, intentionally skipping read-only mounts, ELF/MZ binaries, and zero-length files to avoid crashing the host.
  • Encryption is performed using the ChaCha20 algorithm, supporting both full and partial file encryption modes.
  • No network C2 loop or data exfiltration routines were observed; the malware relies on a hardcoded string 'DontDecompileMePlease' for metadata key derivation.

Affected Systems

  • Linux

Attack Chain

The malware first verifies it has root privileges before parsing a JSON configuration file. It then executes pre-encryption actions, which include disabling SELinux and AppArmor, stopping services, killing processes, and creating a cron entry for persistence across reboots. Next, it enumerates the filesystem via /proc/mounts, skipping read-only mounts and specific file types like ELF/MZ binaries to maintain system stability. Finally, it generates per-file keys, writes metadata (using a hardcoded string for key derivation), and encrypts files using ChaCha20 in either full or partial mode.

Detection Availability

  • YARA Rules: No
  • Sigma Rules: No
  • Snort/Suricata Rules: No
  • KQL Queries: No
  • Splunk SPL Queries: No
  • EQL Queries: No
  • Other Detection Logic: No

The article does not provide specific detection rules, but outlines behavioral indicators such as the disabling of SELinux/AppArmor and the use of a specific hardcoded string for key derivation.

Detection Engineering Assessment

EDR Visibility: High — EDR solutions on Linux can monitor process execution, service stopping, modification of SELinux/AppArmor states, and cron job creation. Network Visibility: None — The article explicitly states there is no evidence of a network C2 loop or data exfiltration routines in this variant. Detection Difficulty: Moderate — While the encryption phase is fast, the pre-encryption behaviors (disabling security tools, stopping services en masse, adding cron jobs) are highly anomalous and detectable if proper Linux telemetry is collected.

Required Log Sources

  • Linux Auditd
  • Syslog
  • Cron logs
  • File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)

Hunting Hypotheses

HypothesisTelemetryATT&CK StageFP Risk
Look for processes disabling SELinux or AppArmor followed shortly by mass service termination or process killing.Process execution logs (Auditd/EDR)Defense EvasionLow
Monitor for unexpected cron job creation by the root user, especially if associated with unknown binaries or scripts.Cron logs, File creation eventsPersistenceMedium
Detect rapid, sequential file modifications across multiple mounts, specifically excluding read-only mounts and ELF binaries.File system events (FIM/EDR)ImpactLow

Control Gaps

  • Lack of purpose-built Linux anti-ransomware controls
  • Over-reliance on network detection (which fails here due to the absence of C2 communication)

Key Behavioral Indicators

  • Commands or API calls disabling SELinux/AppArmor
  • Mass process/service termination by a single parent process
  • Creation of reboot-time cron entries by anomalous processes
  • Reading /proc/mounts followed by high-volume file I/O
  • Presence of the 'DontDecompileMePlease' string in memory or written files

False Positive Assessment

  • Low

Recommendations

Immediate Mitigation

  • Ensure critical Linux servers have immutable backups stored offline.
  • Review and restrict root access and privilege escalation paths on Linux systems.

Infrastructure Hardening

  • Implement purpose-built Linux anti-ransomware solutions that do not rely solely on signatures.
  • Enforce strict SELinux or AppArmor policies and alert on any attempts to disable them.
  • Deploy Automated Moving Target Defense (AMTD) to disrupt execution consistency.

User Protection

  • Enforce MFA for all administrative access (SSH, console) to Linux infrastructure.

Security Awareness

  • Train administrators on the rising threat of Linux-targeted ransomware and the importance of defense-in-depth for server infrastructure.

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

  • T1562.001 - Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools
  • T1489 - Service Stop
  • T1053.003 - Scheduled Task/Job: Cron
  • T1082 - System Information Discovery
  • T1486 - Data Encrypted for Impact

Additional IOCs

  • File Paths:
    • /proc/mounts - Enumerated by the ransomware to classify mounts and determine filesystem traversal scope.